Detailed Outline – Ethical Approval Application

Detailed Outline – Ethical Approval Application

Exploring Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences of Using Professional Management of Complex
Behaviour (PMCB) Disengagement Techniques in Managing Aggression among Dementia
Patients in Irish Mental Health Settings
1. Introduction and Overview
 Introduce ethical review purpose — ensuring that the research aligns with HSE ethical
standards, GDPR (2018), NMBI (2021), and the Belmont Report (1979) principles of
respect, beneficence, and justice.
 State that this ethical submission supports the MSc research project approved under
Dundalk Institute of Technology (DKIT) and HSE Cork/Kerry governance frameworks.
 Mention that the study does not involve patients, biological samples, or clinical
interventions, but focuses on staff perspectives.
2. Section A – General Information
 Principal Investigator: MSc Nursing student, DKIT.
 Supervisor: Dr [Name], DKIT Department of Nursing and Midwifery.
 Site: HSE Cork/Kerry Community Healthcare dementia/mental health unit.
 Purpose: Qualitative descriptive study exploring nurses’ experiences using PMCB
techniques to manage dementia-related aggression.
 Academic Qualification: Master’s Degree in Nursing (Level 9).
 Ensure institutional contact details and research credentials are listed.
3. Section B – Study Descriptors
3.1 Study Background
 Aggression and agitation are common in dementia (Cloak, Schoo & Khalili, 2024).

 Irish policy frameworks such as the HSE National Dementia Strategy (2014) and MHC
(2023) promote person-centred, non-restrictive care.
 Evidence shows nurses often feel unprepared to handle aggressive behaviours (Copeland
et al. 2025, p. 85).
 The PMCB programme trains staff to use safe de-escalation and physical disengagement
(de la Fuente et al. 2019, p. 76).
 Despite widespread training, little qualitative research explores nursnurses’ediences
of PMCB use in Irish practice (Theodoula Adamakidou et al. 2023, p. 3071).
 Aligns with NMBI (2021) ethics on dignity and respect and Belmont principles.
3.2 Aims and Objectives
 Aim: To explore nursnunursnurses’ceptionsxperiences of PMCB disengagement
techniques in dementia care.
 Objectives:
1. Examine understanding and application of PMCB techniques.
2. Identify barriers/facilitators to safe PMCB use.
3. Explore organisational influences on nursnunursnurses’fidenceafety.
4. Recommend training and policy improvements for HSE and NMBI frameworks.

3.3 Design and Methodology
 Design: Qualitative, descriptive, exploratory (Doi et al. 2024, p. 106).
 Sampling: Purposive; 10–12 registered nurses with ≥1 year dementia experience (Jang et
al. 2024, p. 378).
 Data Collection: Semi-structured interviews (30–45 min) via Teams or in person.

 Analysis: Thematic, using Braun & Clarke’s phase approach (Brailas 2025, p. 78); software.
 Ethics: Voluntary informed consent; GDPR-compliant confidentiality (Chhetri et al.
2022, p. 2763).
 Sample Justification: Data saturation expected with 10–12 participants (Busetto et al.).
2020).
3.4 Anticipated Outcomes
 Thematic insights into nurses’ biographies.
 Identification of training and organisational gaps.
 Recommendations for dementia-care improvement in HSE policy.
4. Section C – Study Participants
4.1 Selection and Recruitment
 Registered nurses in HSE Cork/Kerry dementia units (Calsolaro et al. 2021).
 Recruitment via gatekeepers (nurse managers/educators).
 Ensures voluntariness and prevents coercion.
4.2 Inclusion/Exclusion
 Include: NMBI-registered nurses with ≥1 year dementia care, PMCB trained.
 Exclude: agency/probationary staff, non-nurses, or those under investigation.
4.3 Informed Consent Process
 48-hour reflection period before signing (Cuddihy et al. 2024).
 Consent covers participation, audio recording, anonymisation, and data use.
4.4 Vulnerability and Safeguards
 Recognises workplace power dynamics.

 Confidential recruitment, anonymised transcripts, and voluntary withdrawal rights ensure
justice (Belmont Report).
5. Section D – Research Procedures
5.1 Participant Activities
 Single semi-structured interview (30–45 min).
 Conducted privately or online; recorded with consent (Aidana Karibayeva et al. 2025, p.
813).
 Questions focus on PMCB, organisational support, and safety (Alruwaili et al. 2025, p. 90).
5.2 Risks and Safeguards
 Possible emotional distress (Pachi et al. 2023, p. 2031).
 Mitigation: voluntary withdrawal, confidentiality, EAP support (Lynch et al. 2025, p.
529).
 Adheres to beneficence and non-maleficence.
5.3 Benefits
 Reflective professional insight, staff empowerment, enhanced policy alignment (MHC
2023).
5.4 Monitoring
 Researcher monitors emotional wellbeing (Ghimire 2025, p. 312).
 Post-interview debrief; EAP information provided.
5.5 Data Dissemination
 Aggregate thematic presentation only; shared via MSc thesis, conferences, and journals.
6. Section E – Data Protection
6.1 Governance

 Data Controllers: DKIT (primary) and HSE Cork/Kerry (joint).
 Processor: PI (student).
 Lawful, transparent processing per GDPR (2018).
6.2 Security Measures
 Encrypted laptop; locked cabinet for consent forms; no cloud storage.
 Pseudonymised transcripts (Hernandez et al. 2024, p. 55).
6.3 Retention
 Secure retention for five years; destruction thereafter (Adnan et al. 2025, p. 1139).
6.4 Confidentiality
 Use of pseudonyms; compliance with HSE Confidentiality Policy (Adil Hussain Seh et al.)
al. 2020, p. 133).
7. Section J – Indemnity and Insurance
 DKIT provides institutional indemnity for postgraduate research.
 HSE site indemnity applies under the HSE Research Governance Framework (2018).
 Public liability and professional indemnity cover both the researcher and the participants.
 No external funding or sponsor influence.
8. Section K – Cost, Resources, and Funding
 Estimated total cost: ~€125 (self-funded).
 Supported by DKIT access to NVivo and academic resources.
 No external or commercial funding.
 No payments to participants or investigators.
 Transparent financial disclosure (HSE 2018 governance).
9. Section L – Additional Ethical Issues

9.1 Emotional Distress
 Acknowledges possible psychological discomfort, mitigated by trauma-informed
interviewing and EAP referral.
9.2 Power Dynamics
 Recruitment via gatekeepers; anonymity preserved.
9.3 Confidentiality Risks
 Small-unit anonymity is protected through generalisation.
9.4 Researcher Reflexivity
 Reflexive journaling and supervisory debriefs to limit bias.
9.5 Dissemination Ethics
 Findings presented constructively, avoiding institutional blame.
9.6 Ethical Framework Alignment
 Compliant with Belmont Report, NMBI (2021), MHC (2023), HSE (2018), and Data
Protection (2018) standards.

References

Adil Hussain Seh, Zarour, M, Mamdouh Alenezi, Sarkar, AK, Agrawal, A, Kumar, R, Khan,
RA (2020). 'Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications', Healthcare, vol. 8,
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, no. 2, pp. 133–133, viewed 1 November
2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/8/2/133
‌Adnan, A., Kausar, F, Shoaib, M, Iqbal, F, Altaf, A., & Asif, H.M. 2025, ' A Secure and Privacy-
Preserving Approach to Healthcare Data Collaboration', Symmetry, vol. 17, MDPI AG,
no. 7, p. 1139, viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/17/7/1139

‌Aidana Karibayeva, Vladislav Karyukin, Balzhan Abduali; Amirova, D 2025, ‘Speech Recognitionynthesis Models and Platforms for the Kazakh Language, Information, vol. 16, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, no. 10, pp. 879–879, viewed 1
November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/10/879
‌Alexios Brailas 2025, ‘Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative Research: Beyond Outsourcing Data
Analysis to the Machine’, Del’teDel’tedal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 78–78, viewed 1 November
2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2813-9844/7/3/78
‌Alruwaili, MM, Munir, F, Carrillo, &, & Soetanto, R 2025, ‘Explo’Explori’gh, Safety, and Mental
Health Practices in the Saudi Construction Sector—Knowledge, Awareness, and
Interventions: A Semi-Structured Interview’, Saf’t’, vol’ 11, Multidisciplinary Digital
Publishing Institute, no. 3, pp. 90–90, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/11/3/90
‌Animesh Ghimire 2025, ‘Concealing and Confronting: A Reflexive Inquiry into
Mental Health and Wellbeing Among Undergraduate Nursing Students. Students’ 5, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, no. 9, pp. 312–312,
viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/15/9/312
‌Calsolaro, V., Grazia Daniela Femminella, Rogani, S, Esposito, S, Franchi, R., Okoye, C, Rengo,
G., & Fabio Monzani, 2021, 'Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia
(BPSD) and the Use of Antipsychotics, vol. 14, Multidisciplinary
Digital Publishing Institute, no. 3, pp. 246–246, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/14/3/246
‌Chhetri, TR, Kurteva, A, DeLong, RJ, Hilscher, R, Korte, K, & Fensel, A 2022, ' Data Protection
by Design Tool for Automated GDPR Compliance Verification Based on Semantically

Modelled Informed Consent', Sensors, vol. 22, MDPI AG, no. 7, p. 2763, viewed 1
November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/7/2763
Cloak, N, Schoo, C, & Khalili, YA 2024). Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms in
Dementia. Nih.gov. StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved 1 November 2025, from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551552/
Copeland, D., Potter, M, Tipton, S, & Culter, D. 2025, ' Nurses' Perceptions and Expectations of
Patient Violence: Language Matters', Nursing Reports, vol. 15, Multidisciplinary Digital
Publishing Institute, no. 3, pp. 85–85, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4403/15/3/85
‌Cuddihy, L., Howick, J, Murphy, E, & Shiely, F., 2024, ' When describing harms and benefits toPotentiall trial participants, participant information leaflets are inadequate, Trials, vol. 25,
Springer Science+Business Media, no. 1, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-024-08087-9.
de la Fuente, M, Schoenfisch, A., Wadsworth, B., & Foresman-Capuzzi, J, 2019, & Impact of
Behaviour Management Training on Nurses' Confidence in Managing Patient
Aggression', JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, vol. 49, Ovid Technologies
(Wolters Kluwer Health), no. 2, pp. 73–78, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30633062/
‌Doi, M, Tanaka, A., Nemoto, N, Watanabe, T., & Kanoya, Y. 2024, ' Dementia Care Nursing for
Apathetic Older Patients: A Qualitative Study', Geriatrics, vol. 9, MDPI AG, no. 5, p.
106, viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2308-3417/9/5/106
‌Hernandez, M, Konstantinidis, E, Epelde, G., Londoño, F, Petsani, D., Timoleon, M, Fiska, V.,
Mpaltadoros, L., Maga-Nteve, C., Machairas, I.,& Bamidis, P.D. 2024, ‘A Secur’ Publishing and Access Service for Sensitive Data from Living Labs: Enabling

Collaboration with External Researchers via Shareable Data, Big Data, and Cognitive
Computing, vol. 8, MDPI AG, no. 6, p. 55, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2504-2289/8/6/55
Jang, Y, Oh, H, Park, J, Rhee, M-K, Park, NS, Chung, S, & Kim, MT 2024, ‘Demen’ia’ Care’Decisions, Caregiving Situations, and Formal Service Use in Korean Immigrant Families:
A Qualitative Application of a Sociocultural Model, Social Sciences, vol. 13, MDPI AG,
no. 7, p. 378, viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/7/378
‌Lynch, L, Moorhead, A, Long, M & Hawthorne-Steele, I 2025, ‘”You ‘” ‘” the’ “hoice of
Whether You’reYou’reng Help or Attempting Suicide”: Exp” o” ing “the Process and
Impact of Mental Health Help-Seeking with Young People (16–25 Years), Social
Sciences, vol. 14, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, no. 9, pp. 529–529,
viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/9/529.
‌Pachi, A., Kavourgia, E, Bratis, D., Fytsilis, K, Papageorgiou, SM, Lekka, D., Sikaras, C,  Tselebiss, A. 2023, ' Anger and Aggression in Relation to Psychological Resilience and
Alcohol Abuse among Health Professionals during the First Pandemic Wave', Healthcar,
vol. 11, MDPI AG, no. 14, p. 2031, viewed 1 November 2025,
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/14/2031
‌Theodoula Adamakidou, Ntempeli, E, Galanis, P, Mantoudi, A, Christos Kleisiaris, Mantzorou,
M, Afroditi Zartaloudi, Chrysoula Tsiou & Paraskevi Apostolara 2023, ‘Facto’Factors’Relatedidence-Based Practice among Community Nurses in Greece: A Cross-Sectional
Study’, Hea’h Health’caree 11, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, no. 23, pp.
3071–3071, viewed 1 November 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/11/23/3071

CLICK HERE TO ORDER A PLAGIARISM – FREE PAPER

Summary
Topic: ethical approval for my research study
Type: Research paper
Education level: Master’s
Citation style: Harvard
Service: Writing
Add-ons: Detailed outline, Plagiarism & AI report
Size: 2,500 words (9.091 pages), double spacing
Sources: 18 sources required
Subject: Nursing
Language: English (UK)
Deadline:

Description

You are required to apply for ethical approval for your study to a health services research ethics committee, including all the necessary appendices. You will be provided with a template for this component of the assignment, and you are required to use the provided template unless an alternative is agreed upon with your assigned supervisor. Based on the previous research study, use the template provided below for the ethics approval. Use references to Irish policies and local policies in HSE Cork/Kerry, if available. Use of a board of trustees and the Belmont Report, if applicable. level 9 writing style. making sure it corresponds to previous research and PMCB.

Do you need me to send on the research you completed for this ethics approval, or do you have it with you (ATTACHED)

If you could add in the mental health commission (MHC) somewhere, that would be great. thanks